Wednesday, 24 October 2012

Muscle Hypertrophy

As you all know I'm lucky enough to be heading up the strength and conditioning for London Broncos Rugby League Academy. The athletes are between the ages of 17-20. The age at which hormones are raging, and muscles are prone to huge growth. 

My personal philosophy on training young rugby league players, or union, is that the year at which they are in the academy are perfect years to make use of the hormones flying round their bodies. Instead on wasting sessions on teaching them more technically challenging lifts such as clean and jerk or the snatch, I keep the movements "simple", with an emphasis on growth.

Recently, myself and the other coaches, have been discussing what type of hypertrophy we are looking to gain; sarcoplasmimc or myofibrillar? 

This got me thinking. How many trainers actually know the difference?

As we all know, or should know, hypertrophy is the process by which muscles growth as a result of physical training. In short, the body responds to minor damage done to the muscles during physical training, and then repairs itself during rest to respond better towards similar stimulus in the future.

The two different types of hypertrophy are completely different to each each on an internal and external level. 

Sarcoplasmic Hypertrophy:
During this sort of muscle hypertrophy, you're focused on increasing the size of the muscle. However, most of this growth is based on liquid and not on real muscle tissue growth. With Sarcoplasmic Hypertrophy, your muscle cells fill up with a fluid called Sarcoplasm. This expands the size of the cells, which gives you the appearance of bigger muscles. These often look rounded and not toned as the muscles expand similar to a water filled balloon. In addition, since most of the growth is based on liquid, this type of hypertrophy does not bring with it additional strength.

Myofibrillar Hypertrophy:
This type of muscular hypertrophy results in an increase in muscle tissue density. You're adding more muscle fibers, making the tissue denser. As more fibers are created, your strength and physical ability increases, often dramatically. However, this muscle growth is less visible as the muscles do not grow outwardly as much as they do with Sarcoplasmic Hypertrophy. However, the muscles may appear firmer and more defined with this type of growth.

Hopefully, you can now see that there is a huge difference between the two types.

Lets bring science to the weights room!

Until next time

Stay Strong

Tuesday, 16 October 2012

Intervals for Aerobic Power

Evening Killers,

Just took a session tonight with the boys at Camberley RFC. They SMASHED it!

Asides from the usual strength/GPP session that we do (I will post it below), I introduced them to some cardiac power intervals.

They are fantastic for increasing your work capacity at all levels

The session looks like this:
Choose either a rower, treadmill or bike.... no cross-trainers... as they suck balls!!

Set 1 - 60 seconds of hard work...hard work means 110% effort....DO NOT HOLD BACK ON ANY OF YOUR WORK SETS
Rest 3 mins
Set 2 - 60 seconds of hard work
Rest 3 mins
Set 3 - 70 seconds of hard work (get the point now....DONT HOLD BACK)
Rest 3 mins
Set 4 - 70 seconds
Rest 3 mins
Set 5 - 80 seconds 
Rest 4 mins
Set 6 - 80 seconds
Rest 4 mins
Set 7 - 90 seconds
Rest 4 mins
Set 8 - 90 seconds

8 sets of white knuckle work!

I will post a video of the Camberley boys work sets, later on.

There gym session, for you keen crabs out there,was:
1. Squats - Work up to a 5 rep max

2. Bench Press - 3 sets of 6 reps (4 seconds on the way down, slow eccentric phase) use 80% of your 1 rep max

3A. Military Press - 4 x 10
3B. Chin Ups - 4 x max reps

4. Group Abs

Until next time

Stay Strong


Monday, 15 October 2012

Zones of Intensity for Weightlifting.

Evening killers,

Was going after it in the gym this evening, and had a thought for a quick article.

Ive lost count of the times when ive seen athletes or gym-goers 'just lift'. Lifting without direction. No percentage perception, or rep/set scheme.

Here's a quick helper for you students of strength:
(working off a 1 rep max)
30%-50% - low intensity for speed orientated sports
50%-85% - medium intensity for force orientated sports, such as weightlifting
85%-95% - high intensity for weightlifting and other sports
95% + - maximum intensity, developes absolute strength.

Another consideration is what type of strength you are developing:
Absolute,
Speed,
Explosive,
Strength Endurance (whilst this will increase endurance, it doesnt actually produce any form of strength. if fact is completely eliminates any opportunity to increase strength, due to neglecting the other three elements).

Until Next time

stay Strong

Whats best for fat loss??


Lets be honest..... the debate of what type of training helps lose fat most effectively will never stop. Its life. Trainers like to talk about the latest and most “trendy” way to lose fat. It doesn’t mean its effective. And it sure as hell doesn’t mean that they know what they’re talking about. But it does mean that not one “type” of training will ever stay at the top of the castle which makes it hard for people to really know what is best for them or their clients/athletes.
If however, trainers want to see results, rather than see their clients walk out of the gym and munch their way through a 1000 calorie cake, then all that is needed is some common sense.
The body finds it energy from two different sources: glycogen or fat. Now.... how this energy is sourced comes down to the heart rate. If the heart rate is lower, then the body is more prone to burning fat. Whereas, if the heart rate is high, then the body is more likely to use glycogen as the energy source.
Once you know those facts, then surely losing weight must be easy.
Yes! But still we have these trainers that won’t acknowledge the science. They dont realise that the best way to burn of calories is to push your body as HARD AS YOU CAN, for AS LONG AS YOU CAN. This way you will burn off calories. NOT FAT!
These trainers that tend to stick with the HIIT style workouts, are the trainers that can be seen standing in the corner of the gym standing of a BOSU ball, whilst fashioning their latest Nike Pro Gear. All gag, no vomit!
The majority of you readers may think my comments go against the grain, and you’re most likely thinking “why should I listen to this dude?”. That’s fine. But.... I have trained athletes from a variety of sports that require fat percentages to be low: MMA, rugby league, rugby union, cycling, and judo to nam a few. The method I use has worked for me, very effectively.
I tend to have my athletes/clients perform aerobic work at a LOW INTENSITY, whilst performing intervals at the same time. There are three reasons for using this method:
1.       The body utilises fat as an energy source.
2.       The interval method at low intensity allows the athlete/client to go for much longer.
3.       The periods when the athlete/client is “resting” is still an extended period of time that the heart rate is elevated.
All in all, this method provides a positive reaction. The body becomes more efficient at recovering, whilst using fat as an energy source.
Until next time
Stay Strong

Tuesday, 9 October 2012

Get off the high intensity bandwagon!


I’m sick and tired of listening to strength coaches jump on the “high intensity” bandwagon. This god awful bandwagon contains misguided quotes such as “you’ll lose strength if you run for over 20 minutes”… or…. “your biceps will shrink”….or even worse…”you’ll lose power”
SERIOUSLY?
The majority of trainers/strength coaches have this idea in their heads, that if you are working aerobically then you may as well be wearing Lycra and dancing to music. After all, why run for 4 miles when you all you really need to do is perform 8 sets of 20 seconds on, 10 seconds off. Right?
Wrong, again!
Much like all fads in the world today, I am 100% certain that this HIIT fad will die down soon, but for the time being let me at least try my best to make you consider missing the bus that leads to nowhere.
Intensity is a tool. Use it wisely! The higher the intensity, the bigger the disruption of homeostasis, the bigger the improvement OVER A VERY SHORT PERIOD!! If you look at all the research done on a high intensity program versus a low intensity program they were performed over a 4 to 6 week period. So of course you will see a bigger improvement within the high intensity group. Its not rocket science. BUT. And it’s a freakin’ huge BUT… you also a see that the high intensity groups see NO FURTHER IMPROVEMENT after the first initial 3 weeks. Lets take the research done on “tabata”. Tabata seems to be the mother of all intensity programs. The research done on tabata showed that there were no increases in aerobic fitness after the first 3 weeks. Nothing. Nada. Zilch. The way I look at it, you’ve trained hard for 3 weeks for nothing. The ONLY way they could have continued to see improvements was to raise the intensity, and continue to raise the load on the athlete which will soon reach its peak. Lets not forget about the lyrca wearing low intensity group. They continued to see improvements throughout the course of the study.
End result = higher intensities produce bigger increases, but are much shorter lived. You have to keep increasing the intensity, to keep going.
So what happens if you throw massive amounts of intensity at your athletes, unnecessarily, you’ve just increased the intensity threshold tenfold and fairly quickly they will plateau as you can’t increase the intensity any more. That’s the main reason why we see high intensity do-gooders plateau after about 3 to 4 months. They’ve thrown everything, include the barbell, at their programming, and now have nowhere to go.
Conclusion: If your looking to make money from your fat mums, who come to the gym to “work hard”, but still want to have their double cream shake, then by all means jump on the bandwagon and ride the hell out of her. But if you want to see continual improvements from your athletes, take things a little slower. Athletes don’t need to be doing the most ‘advanced’ methods possible. Increase the intensity over a longer period of time. That’s how you’ll see continual improvements over time.
What ever I say, there will still be those proud few who disagree. It doesn’t bother me. In fact I encourage you to keep going. Soon enough your athletes or clients will jump ship. Then all you’ll be left with is a misused barbell and a broken treadmill.

Until next time

Stay Strong

Sadiv Sets

Afternoon killers,

I bet that non of you have heard of Richard Sadiv?? correct? thought so. Well his nickname is "The Human Crane", pretty badass from my point of view. He's over 40 years old and still out deadlifts most powerlifters.

Anyways, keep it short and sharp, he designed a method of training your deadlift called "Sadiv Set's". Its a pretty simple concept - Take 70% of your 1RM. Set running clock for 10/12 minutes. Perform as many SINGLES as possible.

Being the student of strength that I am, I set a clock and went for it. Enjoy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YulEu8KGats&feature=plcp

Until next time

Stay Strong

Monday, 8 October 2012

What is Conditioning??


The word “conditioning” is thrown around a lot. Coaches use it when they make their athletes run. PT’s use it when they want to sell a different package. Internet gurus want to use it when they need to sound intelligent. But, do they really understand what the word means?

Far too frequently strength coaches or PT’s use the word “conditioning” without really having a solid understanding of what they are talking about. Conditioning is:
A measure of how well an athlete is able to meet the energy production demands of his/hers sport
A rugby player, who is able to generate power for a scrum, is as well conditioned as a hockey player who can cover 12km per game. Conditioning is more than just about “cardio”, which is very much misunderstood within the strength and conditioning world.
What ever the sport, the demands are different. Some sports require a combination of power and endurance. Some sports need a great deal of power but less endurance, and other sports are the complete opposite.
Therefore, conditioning is the result of how well the systems of your body are able to create the energy your muscles need to perform the skills of your sport. You can now hopefully see that conditioning is wrongly mistaken for just “cardio”. Joel Jamieson’s (top MMA Strength coach) research showed us that there are six components that determine your conditioning level, and how well your body can produce AND utilise the energy necessary for your chosen sport:

 

Understanding the important principles of conditioning, will hopefully allow you to fully understand what it truly meant by the term conditioning.
Until next time
Stay Strong