Tuesday, 2 April 2013

Strength Rules the World


Training for improved work capacity without a well-developed strength base is a waste of time!
I would imagine that statement has sent shivers down the spines of the jogging community – but its true. Strength training is the most effective way to increase your work capacity. If your one and only goal is to become more effective at moving yourself/sub maximal/maximal loads better, then strength training will contribute much more to your goal achievement than training for endurance.
It sounds crazy to some of you, but hear me out!
The reason should be obvious to see (I hope). Let’s look at it from a real mans point of view. Loading bricks up flights of stairs is a pretty good example of “work”. To me I would imagine that carrying a 40kg block of bricks up a flight of stairs would be the norm for any labourer. 100 trips may well be a days work. If you can power clean 40kg (which I hope you can), then lifting 40kg of bricks isn’t going to be as tough for you, as it would be for some paleo-eating marathon runner who doesn’t lift weights and can only clean 20kg.
His 4 minute mile is irrelevant because lugging 40kg of bricks up a flight of stairs is only an endurance task to a guy that is strong enough to actually perform the work.
So how would one get better at carrying bricks up flights of stairs (when I say that I actually mean “how would you increase work capacity” but god damn it....I’m trying to make a point)? I would bet my last pennies that the skinny marathon runner would go away and run 5 miles per day. Why? Because when he performed the task his heart rate spiked and the next day he was fooked! However, running 5 miles a day would be a great example of avoiding the issue!
The best and ultimately correct way to adapt your body to carrying multiple loads all over the place would be to spend more time getting your squat, press’s and deadlift max’s up.
The most important thing to understand is that “strength is the most general of all athletic adaptations. All the other physical components such as power, endurance, balance, and co-ordination depend on the production of force within the physical environment” (Jim Wendler). Basically, if your strength improves, all the other components will.
For a guy who isn’t very strong, spending time improving his strength will be much more beneficial to improving his work capacity than spending time on the other derivative components. This point is especially true when you realise that improving your strength does not take that long. I guarantee that any athlete you train will tell you that strength training has the biggest positive impact on their other abilities.
When looking at the “huffing and puffing” aspect, strength training can actually improve VO2 Max values [in untrained populations]. Not a lot I'll grant you that, but it does have a slight improvement. For the novice lifters out there, strength training improves that aspect of fitness as efficiently as the millions of conditioning programs that are floating around out there on the web.
Before you “strength and conditioning specialists” out there start slating me, remember that we are talking about skinny marathon runners that do near to no strength training at all. I agree that past a certain point of strength development, some heavy sled pushing on a regular basis is beneficial.
Another point to look at is the difference between a STRENGTH adaptation and a CONDITIONING adaptation.
A man’s strength improves quickly at first, but will soon plateau and ultimately can be developed for years and years – strength training is “a long term adaptation because it requires the construction of new tissue and the restructuring of tissue already in place” (Cal Dietz). Strength training does not disappear after a layoff. Once a dude gets strong, he’s always stronger than he was before, even if he stops his training. This is because the long term adaptations have raised his baseline strength.
However....conditioning develops rapidly but goes away just as quickly. As I would imagine most of you have realised at some point in your training life. You can run 4 miles a day for four weeks and get into pretty good shape. But rest up a couple of weeks and....woops....your back to square one. “A conditioning adaptation changes the metabolic environment in the cells without the need for the large scale tissue remodelling necessary for a strength adaptation” (Cal Dietz...again). Conditioning is like a lap dance – it comes on quickly, it can be maintained (as long as you pay/work hard), but if you neglect it for just a second it (she) will disappear.
 
Why neglect conditioning if it comes on quickly and is easy to maintain? Because if you're weak as piss you definitely don’t need it as much as you need to be strong. And as we all know...time is money gentlemen.
Doing loads of “CV” work, or busting your gut by doing “Met-Cons” every bloody day will have a disgusting effect on your strength gains, where as getting stronger will improve your work capacity all by its self. Strength training is like a faithful wife....she’s going to be there for a long time, and she will get better if you treat her kindly. You can go away with the lads for 2 weeks...come back...and she’ll be at the door greeting you with a cool alcoholic drink of your choice (no brand promotion on this blog!).
 
The programs that are thrown around the internet to make guys strong and fit are merely allowing them to become good at running away from things.
If you’re not strong....getting stronger IS getting fitter. Geeting stronger IS getting more conditioned. If you’re a novice, don’t weaken your program by doing loads of sweaty work until you need to.
But hey...that’s my opinion.
Stay STRONG!
E

Wednesday, 2 January 2013

Training 100% EVERYDAY - Good or bad?

A bit of food for thought...

There's always been a dark, grey, angry cloud hanging over the principles of training at 100% everyday in the gym.



Are you going to overtrain?

Read this quote by renouned Olympic Lifting coach John Broz:

Saturday, 24 November 2012

A field test - Prowlers Vs Squats

Evening all,
Im currently a week into a field "test" that I have been wanting to do for a fair while now.
I'll cut to the chase....
The aim is to see if replacing heavy squats with heavy prowlers, makes any difference to your 1RM.
2 weeks ago I tested my squat 1RM.....maxed out a comfortable 170kg. For the past two weeks I have replaced ALL squatting with heavy prowlers. This is how my prowler week looks:
Monday - Heavy 15m Prowler Push - 10/15 sets
Wednesday - Heavy 5m Prowler Push - 10/15 sets
Friday - Heavy 10m Prowler Push- 10/15 sets
And yes my CNS was fried after the first week. However, the next week I came back and pushed a lot more weight than the previous sessions.
This may or may not work, but I thought I'd be the one to find out.
Below is video of my last 10m heavy pushing session. Worked up to a final set of 270kg/600lbs at a bodyweight of 102kg.


Until next time,

Stay Strong

Olympic Lifting - to lift or not to lift?

The Clean & Jerk and the Snatch…. The staple diet of any UKSCA qualified “strength and conditioning” coach, BUT are they the only way to get powerful?
I believe the Olympic lifts have gained popularity through supposed specificity for sports, i.e. how well the exercise can be carried over onto the field. However from where I’m sitting surely you will never/rarely recreate the biomechanical rate of force that occurs within the competitive environment.  In reality there is no exercise/lift that is 100% specific to the sport of your choice (unless your sport is weightlifting), however what can be specific is the way in which you train your athletes energy system. If your sport is aerobic…then cardiac intervals are for you….. if your sports is alactic…then 10/20m speed is the way forward (at a very basic level). Olympic lifts are general movement patterns that conditioners try to pass of as “specific”. Let’s get it straight…. exercises are specific to the exercise being trained.
Having spent the majority of my conditioning time dealing with elite rugby union or league players I base most of my opinions on how those athletes have reacted or adapted to the movements. With that in mind, the  point at which the most gains will be made is during the pre season phase. Players can handle a large amount of stress that is put on their CNS, whilst having an adequate time to recover. If you are having to try and teach two, technically very difficult, movements to players then the true benefits will not be seen for at least 2/3 weeks whilst they figure out the correct movement patterns. Now in my opinion, the amount of time it takes to teach and benefit from a coordinated and complex movement is sometimes not worth the return especially if the players are at the ages at which their hormones are raging and they would benefit a lot more from hypertrophy or strength phases, rather than focusing on mastering a technique in which the elite Olympic Lifters are still trying to master themselves.
Another reason for my own personal neglect of the Olympic lifts is that the force only moves in a vertical plane of motion! During a rugby union or league game there is rarely time in which the production of force is vertical rather than horizontal. If you, as a conditioner, are looking to provide specificity within the production of power, why develop a motion than is travelling in completely the wrong direction?

The last point that I will make about the Olympic lifts, is that they don’t address unilateral strength or have any rotational components. Both aspects are huge within the world of combat or collision sports.
I would imagine that many disagree with my opinions. It doesn’t bother me. In fact I would encourage it. Variety is the spice of life.
Until next time,
Stay Strong!

(A big citing goes to Buddy Morris for this post!)

Thursday, 8 November 2012

Finishers!!!


You’ve done your heavy sets….. You’ve done your accessory lifts….. You’ve tickled the abs…. now what?

 
Meet the “finisher”!

 
The majority of trainers or conditioners would think of a finisher as a “five minute blast” of a “met con” but in reality, a finisher is an exercise that compliments your main objective within the workout....for example, if you've benched that day, then you find a finisher that hits the chest and triceps (Ring Push Up Drop Set).

You usually perform the exercises to failure, aiming for one almighty set!  It’s not a CrossFit style haphazard combination of exercises. You need to think about what your goals are for that workout and THEN figure out what your finisher will be.
 
 
Below are a list of variety of different finishers that you could incorporate into your workouts.

 
Upper Body Finishers:

Ring Push Up Drop Set


 
Inverted Row “Burnout” Set



Inverted Row Drop Set (An absolute killer!!)



Lower Body Finishers:

Goblet Skater Squats


 
Chain RDL


 
Landmine Reverse Lunges


 
Just a word of warning; if your looking for an easy route then your in the wrong place. Finishers are meant to be tough.
 
Don’t bitch and squeal. Embrace and adapt.


Until next time

Stay Strong

Monday, 29 October 2012

Nutritional Timing for Athletes

With the speedy rise in the popularity of protein shakes, post-workout drinks and energy bars, I felt that it would be only right to share with you guys my thoughts on correct timing of nutrition throughout your training periods.

As we all know, during a 24 hour growth cycle, the muscles in our bodies are involved in three different activities; production of energy, recovery, and growth. During these periods it is key for an athlete to understand what food/drinks of consume and when.
Unfortunately the idea that more protein is better can be misleading to athletes. You could eat an entire pig, but if your muscles are not receptive at that particular time then the protein will be wasted.

 
There are three different phases that the muscles travel through during the 24 hour growth/recovery period after a workout:

The Energy Phase:

·         The phase coincides with your workout.

·         The main objective of muscle is to realise the right amount of energy to drive muscle contraction.

·         During this phase it is important to consume the correct amount of carbohydrates to prevent fatigue or the depletion of energy within the muscles.

The Anabolic Phase:

·         This period is active during the 45 minute window following a workout.

·         Initiates the repair of the “damaged” muscles.

·         Replenish glycogen stores.

·         The period at which muscles cells are extremely sensitive to the anabolic effects of insulin.
 
The Growth Phase:

·         Extends from the end of the anabolic phase until the beginning of the next workout.

·         Increases the number of contractile proteins.

·         Helps the muscles fully replenish muscle glycogen.

·         Consumption of protein and carbohydrates is essential.

In part 2 of Nutritional Timing for Athletes I will be providing you with some examples of what supplements/foods to be eating during those periods.
So, until next time
Stay Strong

Wednesday, 24 October 2012

Muscle Hypertrophy

As you all know I'm lucky enough to be heading up the strength and conditioning for London Broncos Rugby League Academy. The athletes are between the ages of 17-20. The age at which hormones are raging, and muscles are prone to huge growth. 

My personal philosophy on training young rugby league players, or union, is that the year at which they are in the academy are perfect years to make use of the hormones flying round their bodies. Instead on wasting sessions on teaching them more technically challenging lifts such as clean and jerk or the snatch, I keep the movements "simple", with an emphasis on growth.

Recently, myself and the other coaches, have been discussing what type of hypertrophy we are looking to gain; sarcoplasmimc or myofibrillar? 

This got me thinking. How many trainers actually know the difference?

As we all know, or should know, hypertrophy is the process by which muscles growth as a result of physical training. In short, the body responds to minor damage done to the muscles during physical training, and then repairs itself during rest to respond better towards similar stimulus in the future.

The two different types of hypertrophy are completely different to each each on an internal and external level. 

Sarcoplasmic Hypertrophy:
During this sort of muscle hypertrophy, you're focused on increasing the size of the muscle. However, most of this growth is based on liquid and not on real muscle tissue growth. With Sarcoplasmic Hypertrophy, your muscle cells fill up with a fluid called Sarcoplasm. This expands the size of the cells, which gives you the appearance of bigger muscles. These often look rounded and not toned as the muscles expand similar to a water filled balloon. In addition, since most of the growth is based on liquid, this type of hypertrophy does not bring with it additional strength.

Myofibrillar Hypertrophy:
This type of muscular hypertrophy results in an increase in muscle tissue density. You're adding more muscle fibers, making the tissue denser. As more fibers are created, your strength and physical ability increases, often dramatically. However, this muscle growth is less visible as the muscles do not grow outwardly as much as they do with Sarcoplasmic Hypertrophy. However, the muscles may appear firmer and more defined with this type of growth.

Hopefully, you can now see that there is a huge difference between the two types.

Lets bring science to the weights room!

Until next time

Stay Strong